Most leases use one of three commercial models: utilities inside the rent, landlord recharge or direct supply. The label matters less than the meter boundary, allocation rule and evidence written into the agreement.
Utility clauses decide who holds the contract, carries price and usage risk, pays for common areas and owns the reconciliation. Metering does not change the agreement; it supplies the evidence the agreement needs.
Commercial terms vary by jurisdiction and asset type, and the same labels can describe different mechanics. Read the clauses, not only “gross”, “net” or “all-inclusive”. This guide is operational education, not legal or tax advice.
The tenant pays one predictable amount and the landlord carries utility price and usage risk. The simplicity can suit smaller or short-term units, but the commercial buffer and energy incentive must be explicit.
The landlord holds the supply contract and tenants pay their own metered use plus an agreed share of common services. The model is only as defensible as its meters, tariff basis and written allocation rules.
A direct supply removes the landlord from the unit’s utility bill where infrastructure and supplier rules allow it. Shared areas still need a separate recovery mechanism.
Consider a hypothetical 500 m² office using 4,200 kWh plus an 800 kWh share of common services. The consumption stays the same; the lease model changes who sees, manages and pays for it.
Handover is where vague utility clauses become expensive. Close the tenant’s responsibility on the approved date, retain the applicable readings and prorate shared rules consistently.
See submetering and tenant billing
The answer depends on the lease, VAT treatment, energy-resale rules and jurisdiction. State any permitted fee as its own line, and take legal and tax advice on it.
There is no universal best model. Compare simplicity, price risk, tenant incentive, metering infrastructure, common-area recovery and local law before choosing.
The lease should say. It should also define verification, access, failure response, replacement cost and how affected periods are corrected.
Name the governing meters, reading interval, period-close date, evidence access, estimation rule and handover readings.
Responsibility follows the lease and the local rule. The calculation should never hide vacancy by silently increasing occupied tenants’ shares.
Use the estimation or substitution method agreed in advance, mark the affected values, approve the correction and reconcile once reliable evidence returns.
The lease should grant access to the relevant meter, tariff, allocation and reconciliation evidence while protecting other tenants’ data.
Not necessarily. The legal boundary varies by jurisdiction and commercial structure. Obtain local advice before charging a margin or presenting the landlord as a supplier.
Bring one lease schedule, the meters behind it and a recent period. We will map responsibility, allocation, missing evidence and the workflow required for a traceable charge.